Bragg’s Delay Tactics Against Trump Are Unjust — The Case Should Be Dismissed!

The legal case involving former President Donald Trump has taken an unsettling turn, with reports suggesting that District Attorney Alvin Bragg is intentionally stalling proceedings.

This move seems less about justice and more about keeping Trump entangled in legal issues during a critical political period. Such delays raise serious concerns about the motives behind the case.

Delays in high-profile cases are nothing new, but the timing here feels suspicious. Trump’s legal team argues that these stalling tactics are designed to distract him from his 2024 presidential campaign. With the high stakes, it’s hard not to see this as an effort to derail his political ambitions.

For Trump’s supporters, this is another example of political interference masquerading as legal action. They believe these delays are part of a broader effort to weaponise the legal system against him. Such tactics not only inflame partisan divides but cast doubt on the fairness of the judicial process.

Bragg insists that these delays are procedural and aimed at ensuring a fair trial. Yet, it’s difficult to ignore how these delays benefit Trump’s political opponents. By keeping Trump embroiled in legal battles, the case risks appearing less about justice and more about political strategy.

This situation highlights a troubling trend in America’s judicial system, where high-profile cases increasingly feel like political chess moves.

Public confidence in the courts is already fragile, and delays like this reinforce the perception that the judiciary is being used for political purposes rather than delivering impartial justice.

Trump’s narrative of being targeted by a biased system only grows stronger with each delay. To his base, these legal battles confirm his claims of being a victim of a “witch hunt.” Ironically, such tactics may backfire, galvanising his supporters and boosting his campaign efforts.

Justice must not only be impartial but also timely. Prolonged delays weaken the case’s credibility against Trump and give the impression of ulterior motives. Whether or not the charges have merit, the drawn-out process undermines faith in the legal system.

If the case against Trump lacks substance, it should be dismissed to avoid further eroding public trust in the judiciary. Otherwise, the process must move forward without delay to prove that justice is being served.

Anything less risks turning this legal battle into a political spectacle, damaging the system’s credibility for years.