UCOPENHAGEN—A diplomatic spat erupted over the weekend after U.S. Vice President JD Vance’s whirlwind trip to Greenland. On his visit, Vance accused Denmark of neglecting the territory’s security, prompting a sharp rebuke from Danish leaders.
During a Friday visit to the U.S. Space Force base in Pituffik, Vance echoed President Trump’s interest in acquiring Greenland, stating Denmark had “underinvested” in the island’s defenses.
“Our argument is with the leadership of Denmark,” Vance said, praising Greenlanders as “incredible” people with untapped potential.
Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen swiftly responded, posting a video message on X criticizing the U.S. approach.
“We are open to criticism, but we do not appreciate the tone,” Rasmussen said. “This is not how you speak to close allies.”
Security vs. Sovereignty
Rasmussen emphasized Denmark’s longstanding military cooperation with the U.S., citing a 1951 agreement allowing American bases in Greenland.
He noted that both nations are NATO members and share Arctic security concerns amid growing Russian and Chinese activity.
But Danish leaders pushed back against Vance’s characterization of their commitment.
Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called the comments “unfair,” highlighting Denmark’s increased defence spending and partnership with Washington. Martin Lidegaard of the Social Liberal Party went further, labelling Vance’s statements “disrespectful and incorrect.”
Why Greenland Matters
The remote island has become a geopolitical hotspot due to its strategic Arctic location and vast resources.
The Pituffik base—home to 150 U.S. troops—is critical for missile defense and space surveillance. Vance argued that Greenlanders’ security is “very much our security,” suggesting that the U.S. would better protect the territory than current or potential rivals.
What’s Next?
While Denmark remains open to an expanded U.S. military presence, the public friction highlights growing tensions over Arctic influence.
As climate change opens new shipping routes and resource opportunities, Greenland’s future – whether under Danish rule, U.S. partnership, or greater autonomy – remains a pressing question.
“Should Greenland have a say in its security future? Share your thoughts below.”
For more political updates, follow our live coverage.
