News

Trump Attorney Clashes with Host on Role of Ex-Biden DOJ Official in New York Hush-Money Case

Published

6 months ago

June 2, 2024

Former President Trump speaks to the media alongside his attorney Todd Blanche after his hush money trial in New York, Thursday, May 30, 2024. (Michael M. Santiago/Pool Photo via AP)

Former President Trump’s attorney, Will Scharf, revealed the post-conviction strategy following Trump’s recent criminal conviction, alleging political motivations and judicial misconduct.

During an appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” Scharf raised concerns over the involvement of a former DOJ official in the Manhattan DA’s prosecution team, suggesting a potential conflict of interest.

Bragg and Matthew Colangelo at Trump verdict press conference

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg hosted a news conference following the conviction of former President Trump on May 30, 2024, in New York City. Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo is seen on the right, standing behind Bragg. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Scharf emphasized that Trump would cooperate with the pre-sentencing investigation while preparing to appeal the verdict. He expressed strong reservations about the trial’s fairness, highlighting prosecutor Matthew Colangelo’s presence during the announcement of guilty verdicts.

Despite objections, Scharf maintained that political coordination within the legal system was evident. Throughout the interview, Scharf criticized what he perceived as the politicization of the legal process, characterizing the trial as a “zombie case” revived for political purposes.

He accused Judge Juan M. Merchan of bias and argued that the jury instructions were manipulated to sway the outcome against Trump.

Trump and Todd Blanche address the media after hush-money guilty verdict

Former President Trump speaks to the media alongside his attorney Todd Blanche after his hush money trial in New York, Thursday, May 30, 2024. (Michael M. Santiago/Pool Photo via AP)

In response to potential complications during sentencing, Scharf defended Trump’s right to speak out against perceived injustices. He contended that Trump’s commentary on the case was essential, especially given the gag order imposed during the trial. Scharf underscored the importance of public discourse on legal integrity issues, particularly during a presidential campaign.

Regarding the trial’s aftermath, Scharf voiced concerns about the precedent set by the conviction, particularly given its timing amidst a highly contested political climate.

He stressed the need for transparency and accountability within the legal system to uphold the rule of law and ensure fair treatment for all individuals, regardless of their political affiliation.

Judge Juan Merchan refused to recuse himself in the Trump hush money trial. (Getty Images)

Scharf also highlighted discrepancies in the handling of evidence and witness testimony during the trial, suggesting potential grounds for appeal.

He pledged to vigorously challenge the conviction on multiple fronts, including allegations of prosecutorial misconduct and judicial bias.

Scharf reiterated Trump’s commitment to fighting the charges and clearing his name as the legal battle unfolded. He expressed confidence in the appellate process and vowed to pursue all available avenues to secure a favourable outcome for his client.

In conclusion, Scharf emphasized the broader implications of Trump’s case for the integrity of the legal system and the principles of justice. He called for a thorough review of the trial proceedings and urged stakeholders to uphold the fundamental rights of all individuals involved.