PORTLAOISE, Ireland (M10News Legal Desk) — A Roma woman who argued her children would face bullying if returned to the Czech Republic has lost her bid to avoid extradition from Ireland.
Lucie Balgova, mother of three, faced jail in Czechia for shoplifting, including the alleged theft of €3 worth of chicken wrap strips from a Tesco store. She had claimed her children flourished at school in Portlaoise, Co. Laois, but had suffered discrimination in her home country.
Balgova argued that surrendering to Czech authorities would breach her rights under the European Convention on Human Rights, but the High Court ruled against her.
Judge Patrick McGrath noted Balgova had arrived in Ireland fully aware of a 12-month sentence imposed in Czechia for two theft offences and that she faced prosecution for a third alleged theft.
Details of Alleged Offences and Court Findings
The offences occurred in late 2022 and early 2023. The European Arrest Warrant listed the charges as “scam/swindling,” though the narrative account described shoplifting.
Balgova told the court her children’s father was serving a custodial sentence in Czechia, leaving her as the sole carer with no relatives or friends to help.
Judge McCarthy said, given the minor nature of the offences, the Irish court contacted Czech authorities to confirm whether extradition was still required. The Czech authorities insisted on her surrender, citing her criminal record and prior unserved prison sentences.
“Given the defendant’s personality, her criminal history and the number of unconditional prison sentences she has not served, it is obvious that she fled to Ireland to avoid the sentences already imposed and the prosecution in the present case,” the authorities stated.
The alleged theft of two chicken wrap strips was cited as evidence of continued risk of offending, reinforcing the Czech authorities’ request.
Public Interest and Family Considerations
Justice Minister Jim O’Callaghan acknowledged that surrendering Balgova would separate her from her children, but said such hardship is an inevitable consequence of extradition where a parent is involved.
Judge McCarthy emphasised that there is a strong public interest in surrendering persons accused or convicted of crimes to countries with which Ireland has extradition agreements.
“Disruption, indeed, significant disruption, of family and private life is the norm where surrender is ordered and this cannot ordinarily justify a refusal to surrender on foot of an otherwise lawful request,” he said.
The court also highlighted that primary caregiving responsibilities do not exempt individuals from lawful extradition.
Balgova’s case underscores the balance courts must strike between family rights and the enforcement of international criminal justice obligations.
The ruling confirmed that someone in similar circumstances in Ireland would not be immune from punishment because they are a primary carer of young children.
The judgment reflects the firm stance of Czech authorities that extradition is mandatory in cases involving unserved sentences.
The case attracted public attention due to the minor value of the alleged theft and the potential impact on her children’s welfare.
Balgova’s arguments regarding ethnic discrimination and bullying in Czech schools were noted but did not outweigh the legal obligation to surrender her to Czech authorities.
The court concluded that international law and bilateral agreements take precedence over personal circumstances in such extradition cases.
The decision reaffirms Ireland’s commitment to cooperation with European arrest warrants and the enforcement of cross-border justice measures.
Editing by M10News Legal Desk | Contact: legal@m10news.com
© 2025 M10News. All rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited.
