President Biden Considers Dropping Charges Against Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange

The United States is reportedly considering dropping charges against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, as announced by President Biden.

This development follows Australia’s Parliament approving a motion in February for Assange’s return to Australia instead of extradition to the US to face trial for espionage and cyber-crimes.

President Biden’s response to reporters at the White House regarding the motion was cautiously optimistic, with him stating, “We’re considering it,” a response welcomed as “encouraging” by Assange’s legal counsel.

Assange, aged 52, is facing prosecution in the US over allegations of conspiring to obtain and disclose national defence information.

His involvement with Wikileaks, which published vast troves of classified documents, including the infamous ‘Collateral Murder’ video depicting a US military helicopter attack killing civilians in Baghdad, has led to 17 espionage charges and one charge of computer misuse against him.

Pleased to see @AlboMP give his strongest, clearest and most detailed statement on Julian Assange in the Federal Parliament today in response to my question. Please see full question and response at https://t.co/ZBZiBuP39h. #FreeAssangeNOW #auspol #politas

— Andrew Wilkie MP (@WilkieMP) February 15, 2024

Chelsea Manning, the initial leak source, faced severe repercussions with a 35-year prison sentence, later commuted by President Barack Obama. President Biden, during his tenure as vice president, had previously referred to Assange as a “high-tech terrorist.”

Efforts to extradite Assange have been contested by his legal team, citing concerns over freedom of expression and the potential imposition of the death penalty in the US.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has supported Assange’s return home, emphasising the need to resolve his prolonged legal battles.

He has also raised the issue at diplomatic levels in Britain and the US, stressing Australia’s duty to advocate for its citizens.

Geoffrey Robertson, a former legal adviser to Assange, highlighted the significant contributions of Wikileaks in exposing American policies and war crimes.

He expressed that Assange had already suffered enough for his actions, calling attention to the broader implications for freedom of the press and transparency.

The debate surrounding Assange’s fate underscores the complexities of balancing national security concerns with press freedom rights, sparking global discussions on whistleblowing and journalistic responsibilities.

Thursday marks five years since Assange was taken to Belmarsh prison after being removed from the Ecuadorian embassy where he had sought asylum since 2012. His prolonged legal battle and confinement have drawn international attention and support from various quarters advocating for his rights and fair treatment under the law.

Assange’s legal team’s argument against extradition to the US has revolved around fears of unfair trials, potential human rights violations, and the harshness of possible sentencing, including a maximum of 170 years in prison if convicted on all charges.

The case also highlights broader issues of government transparency, accountability, and the role of whistleblowers in exposing misconduct and abuses of power, sparking debates on the limits and responsibilities of press freedom in the digital age.

With ongoing diplomatic efforts and legal manoeuvres, the trajectory of Assange’s case remains uncertain, reflecting the complex intersections of law, politics, and ethics in international justice and human rights protection.

Public opinion and advocacy efforts continue to play a crucial role in shaping the discourse surrounding Assange’s case, highlighting broader concerns about governmental transparency, freedom of expression, and the treatment of whistleblowers worldwide.

Copyright © 2024